ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel girls off to 2-1 start |

Fox Chapel girls off to 2-1 start

Marty Stewart
| Sunday, December 18, 2016 11:00 p.m

The Fox Chapel girls basketball team started off its season at the Seneca Valley tournament on Dec. 9 and beat Burrell, 62-47.

The Foxes were led by Gabby Badway’s 21 points.

They then fell to Hampton in the championship game, 59-46.

“We got off to a slow start both nights,” FC coach Jennifer O’Shea said. “Against Burrell, we were able to get it together after the first six minutes. We shot pretty well, and I was happy with how many girls contributed to the scoring. We kept our turnovers under 10, and Gabby had a nice all-around game.

“Hampton was a different story. They are good. They’re ranked highly and they have three outstanding guards. We turned the ball over way too much and gave them easy points.

“Seneca Valley always has a very competitive tournament. While it would have been nice to win it, this is the time of year when you need to see where your weaknesses are and work to get better before section play.”

The Foxes (2-1) picked up a nonsection win Dec. 14 at home as they defeated Plum, 52-32. Badway scored 20 points.

“It was a well-played game for us and a good one to win as far as building confidence,” O’Shea said.

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.