ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel, SSA benefit from tourney |

Fox Chapel, SSA benefit from tourney

Paul McMullen
| Wednesday, January 4, 2017 1:15 p.m
Jan Pakler | For the Tribune-Review
Fox Chapel forward Jake Livingston reaches for the ball against Shady Side Academy guard Frankie Fuhrer, helping his team to a win during the annual Peter Sauer Memorial Tournament Dec. 28, 2016, at Shady Side Academy.

The Peter Sauer Memorial Tournament began play on Dec. 27 as eight teams took to the court at Shady Side Academy.

Fox Chapel and Shady Side Academy both picked up narrow wins in their opening round games. The Foxes, led by Carson Cohen’s 14 points, rallied to beat Seneca Valley, 46-42, while SSA squeaked by Riverside, 56-53. That set up a semifinal matchup between the victors Dec. 28.

Fox Chapel coach Zach Skrinjar felt the 1:30 p.m. starting time Dec. 27 made an impact.

“I think both teams had a little rust and playing at 1:30 is somewhat of a challenge,” Skrinjar said. “We had some very good looks early that we didn’t knock down, but we continued to stay with the game plan and hit some big shots down the stretch. The main thing was that no one tried to do too much and, even when we were down by four late in the game, there was no panic. We got the stops when we needed to finish out the game.”

In the semifinals, the Foxes prevailed over SSA by a 64-48 score, despite a 20-point effort from the Indians’ Etai Groff. In the championship game Dec. 29, Fox Chapel coasted to a 72-52 win over Community School of Naples, Fla. Jake Livingston had a game-high 24 points.

SSA fell to Woodland Hills, 73-41, in the third-place game.

Both Skrinjar and SSA coach David Vadnais felt the tournament was beneficial.

“I thought that every game of the tournament we improved,” Skrinjar said. “Our defense in all three games kind of carried us. We’re not a flashy bunch, but we have bought into the idea that we can bring defense to every game.

“There will be nights when the offense may not be clicking, but defense can carry team a long way. It was also nice to win the tournament. That was our goal at practice. We viewed it as a three-game season and our goal was to win the championship, and we achieved that. We received numerous strong efforts along the way and everyone who played had some shining moments. It was also nice to see some individuals get recognized with Carson, Michael Snowball and Livingston earning all-tournament honors and Jake getting MVP. In the end, though, it was a team effort”.

Vadnais felt his team rose to the challenge in each game.

“I went into the tournament knowing we would have three very challenging games,” Vadnais said. “We’ve played Riverside the past couple of years, and they were always good and well-coached. I thought we played a good game outside of the final couple of minutes. We didn’t execute and let them back in the game. In the end, a win is a win.

“Fox Chapel is very good this year, as their record indicates. Falling behind 10-0 was the last thing we could let happen. I loved the way our guys fought back, though. They never gave up. At different points throughout the game, we had opportunities to make it a one or two possession game, but couldn’t make the shot and they would go down and get a basket to extend the lead back out. Although we didn’t win, I think we can take a lot of positive things from the game.

“Woodland Hills is another talented team. They jumped out on us like Fox Chapel did but we weren’t able to respond like we did the previous night. Even though we lost two games, I hope we can learn from playing quality teams that are bigger than us. I believe the three games will benefit us as we begin section play next week.”

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.