ShareThis Page
Feds issue license for proposed hydroelectric plant for the Highland Park Dam at Aspinwall |
Fox Chapel

Feds issue license for proposed hydroelectric plant for the Highland Park Dam at Aspinwall

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Allegheny River Lock and Dam No. 2 is located in Pittsburgh, across from Sharpsburg, Aspinwall and Etna. It's just downstream from the Highland Park Bridge.
A single Mallard duck flies over the Allegheny River, framing the Highland Park Bridge and Dam, during the afternoon on Sunday, June 19, 2016.

Hydroelectric power could be fueling the homes and businesses being developed in the Riverfront 47 project along the Allegheny River in Aspinwall and Sharpsburg by 2020.

Rye Development recently announced it has received a hydropower license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and expects to start construction of the 17-megawatt plant next year. The $60 million plant will be built at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Highland Park Dam in Aspinwall.

“Receipt of the FERC License is a key milestone in the project development, capping six years of effort,” said Paul Jacob, communications coordinator for the Boston-based Rye Development. “Our current timeline is 2019 or 2020.”

Jacob said some 150 to 200 jobs will be created during the plant’s two-year construction.

Rye and R47’s developers, the Mosites Co., are working together to develop the project so the plant goes beyond its functional task of generating electricity.

“It’s a neat opportunity for Rye to show how we can integrate into a community,” Jacob said. “Aesthetically, design can reflect that it’s not just a power producer. That’s unique among our projects.”

R47’s plan to turn 47 acres of former industrial property on about 1.5 miles of shoreline into homes, shops and light manufacturing businesses

One example of how the plant might fit with R47 would be to incorporate it into parks within the development.

“It could be a park-like exploration of how power is generated,” said Mosites’ real estate director Mark Minnerly. “It’s great to have Rye building it while we are developing our master plan. We can help Rye make the power plant a natural part of what we are developing. It’s a creative partnership.”

Rye has seven other projects on the Allegheny, Ohio and Monongahela rivers that are about at the same stage of development as its Aspinwall plant, but none involve working to develop a local power grid integrated into a commercial venture like R47. The reliable, renewable energy source goes beyond fitting Mosites’ vision of making R47 an environmentally friendly development, Minnerly said.

“Renewable energy could attract companies that might not otherwise see the site as valuable,” he said.

The plant will generate enough energy for 8,500 homes, but plans for distribution — whether it is all sold locally – have not been determined.

“What we’re working on now is … trying to figure out where usage will be and how to make the best use of the energy,” Jacobs said.

The plant — while being seven stories tall — will have a “minimal footprint” as most of it will be underground and in the water. Jacobs said the top of the plant would be about 10 feet higher than the high side of the dam. As part of its licensing agreement, the company will have to develop recreational opportunities for residents.

“We’re working on exactly what that will look like, but a fishing access is one of the biggest things,” Jacobs said.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.