ShareThis Page
Hartwood Elementary to get visit from state Department of Education STEM consultant |
Fox Chapel

Hartwood Elementary to get visit from state Department of Education STEM consultant

| Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:57 p.m
Jan Pakler | For the Tribune Review
Fox Chapel Area High School
Jan Pakler | For the Tribune Review
Fox Chapel Area High School

Hartwood Elementary students will get a special visit Wednesday from Judd Pittman, special consultant to the Secretary of Education for STEM.

The Fox Chapel Area School District school is among three that Pittman is scheduled to visit, along with Pittsburgh Public Schools’ Lincoln Elementary and Pittsburgh Gifted Center.

Specifically, Pittman will sit in with third graders at Hartwood and be joined by Jacob Hanchar, CEO of Digital Dream Labs, whose flagship Puzzlets game, Cork the Volcano, has been in the digital library at FCA for years.

Jacob will demo two additional games developed for use with the Puzzlets platform that promote sequential thinking and that are the only hands-on gaming system included in CSforALL.

Bonnie Berzonski, district coordinator of communications, said The Grable Foundation has been supporting the use of of gaming and game design in learning communities benefiting students, educators and parents.

Classroom visits have been identified by consultant Heather Mallak because of the educators’ participation in some of these initiatives and their enthusiasm for leveraging play in learning.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or @tawnyatrib.

Categories: Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.