ShareThis Page
No progress on search for Aspinwall police chief |
Fox Chapel

No progress on search for Aspinwall police chief

| Thursday, December 14, 2017 12:18 p.m
David Caplan is shown being sworn in as Aspinwall Police Chief in 2015.

In the month since Aspinwall Police Chief David Caplan resigned, no progress has been made in the search for his replacement.

Council members at a regular meeting last week said it would likely be midway through 2018 before a chief is appointed. Council’s most recent search for a police chief lasted about a year.

Members agreed that the issue is something to be reviewed and moved forward by the incoming council, which includes three new members — Lara Voytko, David Brown and Marcia Cooper —who take office on Jan. 2.

What council couldn’t agree on was whether to promote 19-year police veteran Dave Nemec to acting chief to fill the vacancy while the search is being conducted. He’s been serving as officer-in-charge since Caplan’s resignation.

Councilman Tim McLaughlin said the administrative move would include a $300 pay differential and make Nemec the go-to person for issues on police operations.

It would make him the face of the department on an interim basis, McLaughlin said.

Councilwoman Ann Marsico, however, shot down that idea, saying she believes Nemec lacks leadership skills — citing his decision to take a week’s vacation this month while the department is in flux.

“We historically haven’t appointed an acting chief, and for a five-man department without exorbitant duties, I think they can get help from the office staff when they need it,” she said.

Both McLaughlin and Councilman Mark Ellermeyer disagreed with Marsico, but said they were willing to delay the vote.

Nemec was not at the meeting and was not immediately available for comment.

Council meets at 6:30 p.m. Jan. 2 for its reorganization meeting.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

Categories: Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.