ShareThis Page
Police regionalization study moving forward |
Fox Chapel

Police regionalization study moving forward

Acting Aspinwall Police Chief Dave Nemec said he supports gathering information on police regionalizaiton but doesn’t think it is the right method for the borough. He thinks that a merger would be years off, if approved.

All four of the Lower Valley municipalities that agreed to study police regionalization have completed a survey mandated by the state.

Aspinwall, Blawnox, O’Hara and Sharpsburg voted this spring to be assessed by a specialist with the Governor’s Center for Local Government Services.

The study is free to municipalities and is meant to dissect the policies, functions and costs for each department and also provide ways to improve efficiency.

“We’ve done all we need to do,” Aspinwall councilman Dave Brown said. “We are ready to send our paperwork to the state but we are still several months out from the results.”

Ron Stern, local government specialist, said the study is expected to take about six months.

Participation does not guarantee municipal approval to merge police forces.

It will highlight the perks and drawbacks of forming a regional department, Stern said.

Blawnox Manager John Stinner said he is eager to learn the feasibility of joining the borough’s small force with others. Aspinwall Mayor Joe Noro suggested that the study be performed in a way that would compare the borough’s current community-oriented style of policing with what he calls the “drive-by” style he thinks would result from a merger.

He believes the community would lose the personal touch that officers devote to residents, like walking around town and patrolling on bikes.

Aspinwall councilwoman Marcia Cooper voted for it and said it might provide insight on how to save money through joint purchasing or other cooperative efforts.

Brown said he expects public forums to be scheduled once the results are compiled.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.