Archive

ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional sets buyout cap for new superintendent | TribLIVE.com
News

Franklin Regional sets buyout cap for new superintendent

Tribune-Review
| Monday, February 7, 2005 12:00 a.m

Franklin Regional School Board members say they are enthusiastic about Peter Emery D’Archangelo, hired last month as the district’s new superintendent.

But the board has built an escape hatch into D’Archangelo’s contract, just in case that enthusiasm wanes.

The five-year contract, approved unanimously Jan. 31, allows the board to dismiss the superintendent after a series of preliminary steps — and it caps the cost of buying out his remaining contract at two years’ salary, or more than $220,000.

D’Archangelo will be paid $110,000 per year, pro-rated, for the first few months of his contract. After June 30, his annual salary increases to $112,000.

Should D’Archangelo choose to leave the district before completing his contract, he must repay “a sum equal to 5 percent” of his salary at the time of his departure.

The payback provision was not included in the district’s four-year contract with its previous superintendent, Pamela Pulkowski, who left Franklin Regional last spring with just 60 days’ notice.

Board President Dick Kearns, who negotiated D’Archangelo’s contract with board Vice President Jan Hill, said the contract language gives both parties a measure of security.

“It gives the person leaving some support until they get employed again, plus it helps the board,” he said. “It works both ways.”

Kearns pointed to Mt. Lebanon School District, which recently paid about $500,000 to end the employment of Superintendent Margery Sable, who had three years left in her contract.

In addition to capping D’Archangelo’s buyout at two years’ salary, the contract notes that payments would end sooner “if the Superintendent obtains re-employment, in any capacity.” That prevents a superintendent from receiving a windfall after getting another position.

The 5 percent reimbursement for early departure, Kearns added, allows the district to recoup education costs. The contract calls for the district to pay for D’Archangelo to attend “those meetings and conferences which are appropriate to the position” of superintendent.

The board might make the reimbursement a standard provision in other employee contracts, Kearns said.

“I think the philosophy applies to everyone. Whether we wind up there or not, I don’t know,” he said. “It would tie into tuition reimbursement. If you pay someone to invest in their education and then they leave, you should get reimbursed for that.”

Privately, some board members voiced complaints when Pulkowski gave her notice just a few weeks after returning from an education conference in England, which she attended at the district’s expense. The board was unable to recover that cost because it had given Pulkowski $5,000 and two weeks per year for “intensive professional growth.”

D’Archangelo will receive no such specific benefit, and he must seek the board’s approval for conference attendance at least 30 days in advance.

“I don’t see any reason to put a dollar figure on it,” Kearns said. “If Emery needs something to improve himself, he’ll bring it to the board and we’ll discuss it.

“There is no need to bind yourself up to a number,” he said. “Our mission is to be excellent in what we do, and we want our superintendent to be excellent in what he does. If he has a weakness and he needs to correct that, we want to give him that opportunity. We can budget something without having it in the contract.”

Overall, Kearns said, the pact is in line with those offered to other superintendents in Westmoreland County. Among its notable features are:

  • A $110,000 salary — the same amount paid to Pulkowski — for the first three months of the contract, which takes effect April 11. Effective July 1, D’Archangelo’s salary rises to $112,000.

    After that, the superintendent will receive an annual increase of 3 percent per year, based on satisfactory performance evaluations by the board. An additional “merit adjustment” of as much as 3 percent might be added to the annual base salary “if the superintendent exceeds expectations” based on performance reviews.

  • A maximum $5,000 payment to reimburse D’Archangelo for rental expenses until he finds a home in the district. Once he moves to the district, the board will pay an additional $5,000 bonus, plus moving expenses.

  • A health examination program, long-term disability coverage and health and medical insurance, including major medical, vision and dental insurance. The superintendent will have the same co-payments and deductibles as members of the district’s teachers union.

  • A maximum of $2,000 for membership in professional associations. The district also will purchase a cell phone, laptop computer and a Palm Pilot for the superintendent’s use.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.