ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional softball rallies for big victory against defending section champ |

Franklin Regional softball rallies for big victory against defending section champ

Michael Love
| Tuesday, April 12, 2016 5:30 p.m

The Franklin Regional varsity softball team had hoped to get back on the field quickly and take advantage of momentum built off of a 7-6 victory April 6 over defending Section 2-AAAA champion Fox Chapel.

The Foxes were 3-0 at the time, and the win put the Panthers at 2-0 in the section.

However, Mother Nature didn’t cooperate as rain squashed the scheduled games with Woodland Hills last Thursday and Plum on Friday.

The game at Plum was rescheduled for Monday, and a nonsection game with Norwin was cancelled to make room. But more rain Monday moved the contest with the Mustangs to Friday and created a stretch of four section games in four days.

As hectic as that schedule is, FR head coach Jim Armstrong said his players were ready for the challenge.

It was to begin Tuesday against Penn Hills and continue Wednesday at Woodland Hills, Thursday at Gateway and Friday at Plum.

“The girls want to play games,” Armstrong said.

“We need to (win) these road games, especially at Gateway and Plum. It’s a challenge to win on the road in the section.”

Fox Chapel entered the week 4-1 in section, while Gateway was 3-1 and Plum was 2-1. FR’s games Tuesday and Wednesday were to be contested past the deadline for this week’s edition.

“The girls were really into the game with Fox Chapel,” Armstrong said. “It was a good atmosphere.”

This year’s home game against the Foxes was a different story from last year when the Panthers were shut out by Fox Chapel at home, 3-0.

Franklin Regional then paid a visit to Fox Chapel and handed the Foxes one of their two section losses, 4-2.

Last week’s game started on a down note for FR as Fox Chapel scored four runs in the top of the first inning with no outs recorded.

But starter Angalee Beall and the Franklin Regional defense kept the Foxes off the board from the second to sixth innings, and the Panthers rallied.

A big four-run fourth, spurred on by hits from Brooke Zanotto and Mallory Halleck, a sacrifice fly from Chrissy Kemerer, a squeeze bunt from Bailey Vincett and three Fox Chapel errors, put FR ahead 6-4.

In the fifth, Olivia Vincett singled, stole second and came home on a Jocelyn Behr single to give the Panthers some insurance at 7-4.

Behr went 2 for 3 with a double.

The extra run was crucial as Fox Chapel scored twice in the top of the seventh to set the final.

“The girls never thought they were out of the game,” Armstrong said. “Deficits don’t bother these girls. They stayed calm and started to peck away.”

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5825 or at

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review sports reporter. You can contact Michael at 412-856-7400 x8632, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.