ShareThis Page
Frazier scores high on PSSAs |

Frazier scores high on PSSAs

| Friday, July 20, 2007 12:00 a.m

For the fifth year in a row, the Frazier School District has made adequate yearly progress on the Pennsylvania System of School Assessments. The tests in reading, writing and math were given to students last spring.

Superintendent Dennis Spinella told school directors Thursday that all grade levels met or exceeded state proficiency requirements in all tests. Students in third through eighth grades and 11th grade took the tests in math and reading. Students in fifth, eighth and 11th grades took the writing test.

The state Department of Education has just released individual student PSSA results. Results compiled by school districts will not be released to the public for several weeks.

In other business:

= Directors approved hiring Faris Carpet Inc., Uniontown, to install new carpeting in the Perry Elementary music room and the high school auditorium. Their low bid for removing the old carpet and installing the new carpet was $8,799.

= Directors approved applying for a $5,000 Snee-Reihhardt Grant through the Fayette County Office of Planning, Zoning and Community Development.

= Patricia Thomas, supervisor of curriculum and federal grants, reported that the district received $90,000 in grants last school year. She said this was in addition to revenue budgeted. Some of the money funded summer school. She said she has applied for $1 million in grants for the upcoming school year.

= Directors approved entering into a three-year cooperative agreement with the Perryopolis Borough Police Department to provide a school resource officer. The officer will be paid up to $27,606.53 the first year, $28,7323.57 the second year and $29,869.41 the third year. The salaries assume a maximum of 100 hours per year of overtime. If the overtime is not used, the district will pay less.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.