Freedom of gaming II |

Freedom of gaming II

In response to his column “Protecting kids trumps ‘creative freedom'” (Nov. 4 and, I’d like to respectfully remind Jack Markowitz that the amendment that allows him to support the banning of violent video games in a newspaper is the same amendment that protects game developers.

These men and women are some of the hardest-working people in their fields today. Banning their products would be putting out the fire in a very successful industry at a time when industry is suffering.

If these people are not allowed to express their opinions in their chosen artistic medium, why stop at banning the sale of violent video games• I’d like to quote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regarding this issue: “If you are supposing a category of violent materials dangerous to children, then how do you cut it off at video games• What about films• What about comic books• ‘Grimm’s Fairy Tales’?”

If video games are allowed to be treated specially, that leads to precedent — the government could reserve the right to ban anything it wants if that thing is treated as “special” like a video game.

I do agree with Mr. Markowitz on one point: Parents, pay attention to your kids’ games. We don’t need the government to do that for us.

Timothy Rinehart


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.