ShareThis Page
Freedom of speech |

Freedom of speech

| Saturday, February 5, 2011 12:00 a.m

Once again the world sees a mass movement — this time in Egypt — demanding a stronger voice in government.

We proclaim that is not a problem in our nation, state, county, boroughs and townships. Yet all too rarely do we use our voices. The tasks at hand may not be so invigorating as to call for public demonstration. But there is more to do as citizens than voting (and even the majority often doesn’t do that).

Consider some things recently in the area news:

• Voters this year will elect or re-elect officials on county row. As far as we know, all elected officials in county government have worked together to cut costs and keep taxes stable.

Yet county row officials may be too quiet. As elected officials, they have an obligation to speak directly to the public if they perceive better ways for county government to govern. And it is the obligation of voters to ask the incumbents and challengers seeking office if they think that is the case.

• A work group created by Armstrong County President Judge Kenneth Valasek and made up of government agencies, counselors, church representatives, attorneys and educators is looking at ways to reduce public school truancy. The judge believes the group will be an ongoing project. If you are concerned with the problem of truancy, make your views known to local officials and offer your comments to the work group. And there are always letters to the editor.

• Ford City Council is considering buying a needed new garbage truck for $175,624 through a cooperative state purchasing program. That is a good way to go, but citizens should ask council in this (and other towns) if garage and refuse collection should remain the business of government — or should joint municipal contracts be sought with private haulers, or should private companies just handle the chore• The status quo may well be best, but citizens can seek an open discussion on alternatives.

• The Freeport Leechburg, Apollo Group, an organization working to restore historic charm and economic vitality to their towns and for the development of trails and waterways in the region, will conduct a fundraising dinner March 19. (visit for details). It is a marvelous cooperative effort. Citizens could initiate a dialogue in their towns to see if such an effort can be launched there also.

• No political party has enough volunteers. And none in this area can claim to have enough young people in its ranks. Part of our responsibility as citizens is to become activists for good government, and a direct way to do that is to get in touch with your party leaders and ask what you can do.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.