Archive

ShareThis Page
Freeport, Deer Lakes face must-win situation | TribLIVE.com
News

Freeport, Deer Lakes face must-win situation

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, May 8, 2007 12:00 a.m

The situation facing the Freeport and Deer Lakes softball teams today is simple: The winner advances to the WPIAL playoffs, the loser stays home. No tiebreakers to figure out, no head-to-head criteria.

“That’s pretty much what it boils down to,” Yellowjackets coach Jim Rapp said. “We played them last week and had one bad inning and lost.”

Both teams will enter the contest with 7-4 records in Section 3-AA. The game time has been moved to 5:30 to accommodate a junior varsity game and senior day ceremonies. The WPIAL on Monday announced a one-day extension of the regular seasons for baseball and softball.

This will allow teams to catch up from the extensive weather postponements sustained in April. The playoffs are set to begin early next week in both sports.

Making the softball playoffs is old hat for Leechburg (13-1). The Blue Devils clinched their 19th consecutive playoff berth and are rated second among Class A schools in the latest Tribune-Review News Service poll.

The last time Leechburg failed to make the playoffs was 1988.

Elderton and West Shamokin already have clinched softball berths.

Ford City still has hopes of reaching the baseball playoffs, but Leechburg and Kittanning were mathematically eliminated with yesterday’s losses to Springdale and Uniontown, respectively.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.