Archive

ShareThis Page
Freeport: Tradition doesn’t fade | TribLIVE.com
News

Freeport: Tradition doesn’t fade

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:01 a.m

The A1 VND article, “Farewell stings Freeport fans,” (Oct. 17) about the last home football game at Jim Schwartz Field brought back a flood of meaningful and warm memories.

My brother and cousins played on that field, part of famous Freeport football teams. I proudly wore the blue and gold as a cheerleader during my high school days and most of our 1963 championship team under Coach Bob King went off to college with scholarships.

I remember the businessmen, including my father, decorating their windows for each game and how the town’s anticipation grew each day until Friday night erupted under the lights. I remember lights that shined so brightly descending the hill from routes 28 and 356, lights that lit up all the surrounding streets as people poured into the stands.

I remember the “Quarterback Club,” friends of my father who had played ball decades before, positioning their lawn chairs at the top of the steps to watch the game and call their own plays from that elite perch. And I remember the excitement of watching our team descend those steep steps season after season.

Change is always difficult, but those who worry tradition will be lost with moving to a new stadium need not worry. All of us who have been and are Yellowjackets carry that winning tradition in our hearts.

Freeport football will continue to be played proudly under new bright lights!

Georgie ContiBlackburn

Tarentum

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.