ShareThis Page
Fremd appeals sex-for-drugs conviction |

Fremd appeals sex-for-drugs conviction

| Wednesday, June 4, 2003 12:00 a.m

A convicted Fayette County doctor filed an appeal Tuesday stating he’s undergoing evaluation for an addiction to sex that may explain his behavior.

“The defendant … is in the process of being examined by (a) clinical psychologist for a form of sexual addiction which may have some bearing in trying to explain some of the behavior that led to (his) conviction,” states the appeal, filed on behalf of Dr. Mark Fremd, of Connellsville.

Fremd, 48, was sentenced last month to 1 1/2 to three years in prison for allegedly trading sex for painkiller prescriptions, giving patients narcotics with the understanding that they would sell them, and bilking insurance carriers for medical procedures that he never performed.

He is free on $50,000 bond while his appeal is heard. It could take up to three years to decide if he appeals to the state Supreme Court.

The state medical board has not taken action against Fremd. According to Fremd’s lawyer, the doctor expects to lose his medical license permanently over the convictions.

Defense attorney Paul Gettleman said Fremd already has been punished enough and should not be imprisoned.

“Dr. Fremd punished himself in a way the judicial system never could. He stripped himself of his profession and the lifestyle he and his family enjoyed,” the filing states.

According to Gettleman, Fremd’s wife can’t support the couple’s six children, and he can do work that would benefit the public at large.

He “can provide a unique service … which would militate against locking him up in a cell and wasting the medical services and skills he can provide to Fayette County citizens.”

Fremd asked to have his convictions thrown out, or failing that, a new trial or a lesser sentence.

Fayette County Judge Steve Leskinen will rule on the motions within 90 days. If he rules against Fremd, the doctor can appeal to the state Superior Court. If he is unsuccessful at that level, an appeal can be taken to the state Supreme Court.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.