ShareThis Page
Fuel rises to become biggest American export |

Fuel rises to become biggest American export

The Associated Press
| Saturday, December 31, 2011 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK — For the first time, the top export of the United States, the world’s biggest gas guzzler, is — wait for it — fuel.

Measured in dollars, the nation is on pace this year to ship more gasoline, diesel and jet fuel than any other single export, according to U.S. Census data going back to 1990. It also will be the first year in more than 60 that America has been a net exporter of those fuels.

Just how big of a shift is this• A decade ago, fuel wasn’t even among the top 25 exports. And for the past five years, America’s top export was aircraft.

The trend is significant because for decades the United States has relied on huge imports of fuel from Europe in order to meet demand. It only reinforced the image of America as an energy hog.

And up until a few years ago, whenever gasoline prices climbed, there were complaints in Congress that U.S. refiners were not growing quickly enough to satisfy domestic demand; that controversy would appear to be over.

Still, the United States is nowhere close to energy independence. America is still the world’s largest importer of crude oil. From January to October, the country imported 2.7 billion barrels of oil worth about $280 billion.

Fuel exports, worth an estimated $88 billion in 2011, have surged for two reasons:

• Crude oil, the raw material from which gasoline and other refined products are made, is a lot more expensive. Oil prices averaged $95 a barrel in 2011, while gasoline averaged $3.52 a gallon — a record. A decade ago, oil averaged $26 a barrel, while gasoline averaged $1.44 a gallon.

• The volume of fuel exports is rising. The United States is using less fuel because of a weak economy and more efficient cars and trucks. That allows refiners to sell more fuel to rapidly growing economies in Latin America, for example. In 2011, U.S. refiners exported 117 million gallons per day of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other petroleum products, up from 40 million gallons per day a decade earlier.

There’s at least one domestic downside to America’s growing role as a fuel exporter. Experts say the trend helps explain why U.S. motorists are paying more for gasoline. The more fuel that’s sent overseas, the less of a supply cushion there is at home.

Gasoline supplies are being exported to the highest bidder, said Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at Oil Price Information Service. “It’s a world market,” he said.

Refining companies won’t say how much they make by selling fuel overseas. But analysts say those sales are likely generating higher profits per gallon than the fuel sold in the United States. Otherwise, they wouldn’t occur.

The value of U.S. fuel exports has grown steadily over the past decade, coinciding with rising oil prices and increased demand around the globe.

Developing countries in Latin America and Asia have been burning more gasoline and diesel as their people buy more cars and build more roads and factories. Europe also has been buying more U.S. fuel to make up for its lack of refineries.

And there’s a simple reason why America’s refiners have been eager to export to those markets: Gasoline demand in the United States has been falling every year since 2007. It dropped by an additional 2.5 percent in 2011. With the economy struggling, motorists cut back. Also, cars and trucks have become more fuel efficient and the government mandates the use of more corn-based ethanol fuel.

The last time the United States was a net exporter of fuels was 1949, when Harry Truman was president. That year, the United States exported 86 million barrels and imported 82 million barrels. In the first 10 months of 2011, the nation exported 848 million barrels (worth $73.4 billion) and imported 750 million barrels.

Additional Information:

Top U.S. exports

Here are the top U.S. exports for the past three years:

2011 (Through October)

1 — Fuel: $73.4 billion;

2 — Aircraft: $70.8 billion;

3 — Motor vehicles: $39.6 billion;

4 — Vacuum tubes: $37.1 billion;

5 — Telecommunications equipment: $33.2 billion.


1 — Aircraft: $79.2 billion;

2 — Fuel: $53.7 billion;

3 — Vacuum tubes: $47.3 billion;

4 — Motor vehicles: $39.3 billion;

5 — Telecommunications equipment: $35.3 billion.


1 — Aircraft: $82.9 billion;

2 — Vacuum tubes: $37.7 billion;

3 — Fuel: $36.5 billion;

4 — Telecommunications equipment: $30.8 billion;

5 — Motor vehicles: $28.4 billion.


Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.