ShareThis Page
Fugitive arraigned on home-invasion charges |

Fugitive arraigned on home-invasion charges

The Associated Press
| Sunday, May 9, 2004 12:00 a.m

A robbery suspect who eluded more than 200 police for almost two days by hiding in the woods and an abandoned mine shaft in Washington County was arraigned Saturday on robbery and other charges stemming from a home invasion in that county last month.

Franklin E. Sebetich, 56, of Ellsworth, Washington County, was captured early Thursday morning after a two-day manhunt during which he allegedly shot at police twice.

Sebetich was captured about 1 a.m. Thursday after he emerged from an abandoned mine shaft in New Eagle, where police believe he spent as many as 30 hours. Police had chased Sebetich into a wooded area where the old mine was. They surrounded it on Tuesday, but were unable to find him as they searched by foot, car and air in a one-square-mile section of Carroll Township, Washington County.

Sebetich was hospitalized for exposure after his arrest, but had recovered enough to be arraigned about noon yesterday before District Justice Jay Weller in Canonsburg. Weller scheduled Sebetich’s preliminary hearing for May 18 before District Justice Curtis Thompson, of Ellsworth.

Police charge that Sebetich and another man forced their way into the residence of Joshua Shaw, of Eighty Four, while wearing masks and wielding shotguns. They took several items, including guns, police said.

Sebetich ran into the woods near his home in late April when police tried to arrest him for the April 21 home invasion. Police saw Sebetich again on Tuesday morning and chased the car in which he was riding off Route 481.

Sebetich was denied bail and taken to the Washington County Jail. It wasn’t immediately clear if he has an attorney.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.