Funding finalized for plan to build park across I-579 Downtown |

Funding finalized for plan to build park across I-579 Downtown

A proposed 'cap' linking the Lower Hill District and downtown Pittsburgh would include a city park and pedestrian bridge over Interstate 579 with trees and sidewalks.

A $19 million federal grant will allow Pittsburgh to build a connection between the Lower Hill District and Downtown that is essential to redeveloping one of the city’s most economically distressed neighborhoods, officials said Tuesday.

The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery grant, announced Tuesday, is the final portion of the $26.4 million officials estimate is needed to build a “cap” over Interstate 579, the highway that splits Downtown from the Hill District.

Mayor Bill Peduto said the money “will help heal one of Pittsburgh’s worst efforts at urban renewal, when decades ago city planners separated the Hill District from Downtown and cut the lifeblood from one of our most historic communities.”

The proposed project, which includes plans to build a park and improve pedestrian access between the two neighborhoods, coincides with the Pittsburgh Penguins’ $450 million residential, retail and office space redevelopment plan at the 28-acre former Civic Arena site, which is between I-579 to the west and the Hill District to the east.

City Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle, who represents the Hill District, called the grant a “wonderful step,” but said meaningful improvement in the Hill District won’t occur unless the cap is part of wider redevelopment, especially in the Lower Hill.

That area, formerly the economic heart of the community, was largely replaced by the Civic Arena in the 1960s.

“All of this is an effort to sort of right that wrong and restore a community that has been suffering economically ever since that took place,” he said.

Marimba Milliones, president and CEO at Hill Community Economic Development Corp., called the grant essential to pursuing goals laid out in a Lower Hill redevelopment plan created in 2014 by her organization, Hill District residents, the Penguins and others.

The goals include empowering businesses owned by minorities and women, honoring the Hill District’s cultural legacy and creating work for the district’s artists, architects and landscapers.

“At the end of the day, the 28-acre site has to be developed in order for the community to be reconnected,” she said. “In this case it looks like we are starting at the other end.”

The Civic Arena site is owned by Pittsburgh-Allegheny County Sports & Exhibition Authority, the grant’s recipient, but the Penguins own the land’s development rights.

Penguins President and CEO David Morehouse said this month that the project is moving forward and the team is committed to meeting an October deadline to start a residential portion of the development.

Travis Williams, the Penguins’ chief operating officer, said the proposed cap will be a “catalyst” for talks with potential commercial and office space tenants. A lot of those discussions focus on connectivity to Downtown, he said.

“This cap truly created a marquee feature at this site,” he said.

The grant covers all but about $7.4 million of the total estimated construction cost. The difference will be made up through a combination of state funds, foundation grants, a contribution from the Penguins, and SEA and Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh funds, SEA Executive Director Mary Conturo said.

Nationwide, nearly $4.6 billion in grant funding has ben provided for 381 similar transportation projects since 2009, according to the federal Department of Transportation. The grants are provided for “capital projects that generate economic development and improve access to reliable, safe and affordable transportation for communities, both urban and rural.”

Michael Walton is a Tribune-Review staff writer. He can be reached at 412-380-5627 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.