ShareThis Page
Furyk’s injury flares up again |

Furyk’s injury flares up again

| Friday, September 23, 2005 12:00 a.m

GAINESVILLE, Va. — There could be an interesting occurrence today in the Presidents Cup, although it would mean an injury to a United States team member would preclude him from participating.

Pennsylvania native Jim Furyk, who has ties to the western part of the state, hurt his ribs last week in Tuesday’s practice round prior to the 84 Lumber Classic at Nemacolin Woodlands Resort in Farmington.

That hampered him considerably, causing him to miss the cut after shooting 73-73. But, according to U.S. captain Jack Nicklaus, Furyk took a couple of days off, rested, then practiced for a couple of days and said he was fine.

“He went out today and on the second shot on the first hole, he spasmed,” Nicklaus said. “He had a physiotherapist with him the whole day and he got Jim to where he actually didn’t hurt too bad when he hit a ball, but he had a horrible time trying to walk.”

At one point, Furyk was face down behind the sixth green being worked on. He gutted it out, however, and he and Fred Funk managed to halve their match against Vijay Singh and Mark Hensby.

“Today, honestly, it was the worst I’ve felt of those three days,” Furyk said. “I was swinging well on the range until the last few swings and I knew heading to No. 1 tee that I was in quite a bit of pain and it was going to be a struggle.”

Nicklaus said that while Furyk wants to play in today’s four-ball matches, his status is uncertain.

“At this point, if Jim Furyk cannot play tomorrow, then Tiger Woods (whom he’s paired with) would play a singles match against Gary (Player’s) choice of either Stuart Appleby or Hensby,” Nicklaus said.

Nicklaus also said that if Furyk starts the four-ball session and at some point can’t continue, Woods would compete in a one-against-two situation against Appleby and Hensby.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.