ShareThis Page
Garbage contract to mean higher fees |

Garbage contract to mean higher fees

| Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:00 a.m

Penn Hills will pay more for trash collection now that council has approved a three-year, $5.3 million contract with Greenridge Waste Services.

The contract for collection of trash and recyclables with the Scottdale, Westmoreland County, company represents an increased charge to the municipality of $22per household.

Greenridge, which has had the Penn Hills contract since 2001, was low bidder on the contract. Waste Management was the only other bidder.

The contract was approved unanimously Monday. The previous three-year contract was for $3.9 million.

David Smith, general manager of Greenridge Waste Services, said increases in fuel and labor costs led to the increased charge to the municipality. The new contract takes effect Oct. 1, Smith said.

Cathy Boyd, purchasing agent for Penn Hills, said she did not know how the increased cost to the municipality would affect the tax rate.

Penn Hills still is without a budget for 2004.

Voting on a proposed tax increase of 1.25 mills that would raise the Penn Hills property tax rate to 3.85 mills has been delayed since January. Were that tax rate to pass, the Penn Hills property tax rate would increase by 48 percent.

The owner of a home valued at $100,000 would see the municipal property tax bill increase by $125, to $385.

To make ends meet, officials are drawing operating money from the municipality’s $8 million in capital accounts, plus revenue from the earned income tax and sewer user fees.

Acting manager John Schrecengost has warned that Penn Hills could get into financial difficulty if it doesn’t send out property tax bills by the end of this month.

Council has been deadlocked most of this year, starting with the swearing-in ceremony of Mayor Anthony DeLuca and Councilwoman Yvonne Lamanna on Jan. 5.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.