ShareThis Page
Geeks, in-crowd tussle over city budget |

Geeks, in-crowd tussle over city budget

| Monday, October 25, 2004 12:00 a.m 1. pantsed Having one’s pantspulled down. “I got pantsed today at school.”

Think of Pittsburgh’s financial plight as a teen flick.

The state oversight board, set up to oversee the city¹s finances, is the geeky teen protagonist who always gets hassled by the in-crowd.

For instance, the Governor’s Office failed to include funding for the board in the state budget. That’s the political equivalent of a wedgie, just to show that all the cool kids are in Harrisburg.

Mayor Tom Murphy has been knocking the panel’s thick black plastic glasses off by presenting budgets he insists are balanced, but which the oversight board has rejected.

And another fiscal watchdog group, the Act 47 team, is also working on municipal finances. That makes them the Romeo who’s putting the moves on the geek’s girl.

Last Monday, however, the oversight board snuck into the boys’ locker room and put liniment in Murphy’s jockstrap: The panel refused to accept the mayor’s latest budget.

The climax of a teen flick is always at the prom, and at Pittsburgh High, the prom is in November.

The firefighters are trying to put a referendum on the Nov. 2 ballot asking voters if they favor mandating fire response times. The firefighters think such standards will prevent drastic budget cuts to their department. In other words, the firefighters are taping “kick me!” signs to both of the watchdog boards.

Now the courts are stepping in, which of course will make things even wilder.

Soon after the election, the city and the oversight board must agree on a budget plan. Then the state Legislature must consider implementing the taxes that city plan likely will depend on.

But lawmakers regard a commuter tax as they’d regard getting beaten up for their lunch money. If they balk, city residents could get stuck with a big property tax increase Murphy slipped into his proposed budget, as high school pranksters might slip something gross into the cafeteria food.

So, at Pittsburgh High, by December we should know who the nerds and the cool kids are – the oversight board, the Act 47 team, the mayor, the courts or the Legislature.

But the real geeks seem to be us, the taxpayers, who in one way or another, by the final reel, are likely to get pantsed.

Jim Tynen can be reached at or (412) 320-7948.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.