Geneva College court battle could end |

Geneva College court battle could end

The United States and Pennsylvania now agree that Geneva College’s policy of hiring only Christians is not illegal, a development that could end a court standoff between the two governments and the Beaver County school.

The college claimed its rights to free expression, free speech and church autonomy were violated when it was told it could not mention a religious preference for job applicants in help-wanted ads posted on a government Web site.

In December, it filed a federal lawsuit against U.S. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, state Labor Secretary Stephen Schmerin and the Team Pennsylvania Workforce Investment Board.

The school posted ads on Team Pennsylvania CareerLink, an online employment listing service run by the state that allows postings from employers who do not discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, political affiliation or belief. Because the state program receives federal money, Geneva College was told that the Web site must operate under the federal nondiscrimination provision.

Both the school and the defendants have agreed that the Workforce Investment Act’s nondiscrimination provision applies only to recipients of Workforce Investment Act money. Geneva College is not a recipient and is not subject to the nondiscrimination policy of the state employment Web site, the parties agreed in a court document filed Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti has been asked to dismiss the lawsuit, and could do so as early as this week.

Geneva College is a “Christian college rooted in the Evangelical and Reformed traditions and governed by the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America,” its lawsuit states. The school “requires all of its new hires to demonstrate a credible Christian commitment. The inability of an applicant to articulate a personal faith commitment to Jesus Christ and be supportive of a Reformed worldview will have a direct impact on employment consideration.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.