ShareThis Page
Geneva wins Victory Bowl |

Geneva wins Victory Bowl

| Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:00 a.m

MINNEAPOLIS — Geneva College won its fourth consecutive game to close the season and boosted its Victory Bowl record to 3-0 by beating Northwestern (Minn.), 19-9, on Friday in the annual NAIA postseason game at the Metrodome.

“We earned some respect today,” Geneva coach Geno DeMarco said. “We played a pretty tough schedule, and to come away with four victories in a row to end the season says something about this group of young men.”

The game is sponsored by the National Christian Collegiate Athletic Association.

Kelly Lennox rushed for 171 yards and Josh Mullen 128, as Geneva used a punishing ground attack. The Golden Tornadoes built a 19-0 first-half lead and finished with a 397-290 edge in total yards.

“Our defense played extremely well, and I am surprised that we were able to run the ball as well as we did,” DeMarco said.

Northwestern, ranked No. 22 in NAIA, lost for only the fourth time in the past three seasons.

Geneva (7-5) led 12-0 after the first quarter after Ben Swallow fired a 6-yard touchdown pass to Marko Thomas and Mike Schlereth returned an interception 54 yards. The Golden Tornadoes made it 19-0 on a 46-yard run by Mullen.

Northwestern (8-2) cut the lead to 19-6 in the second quarter on a 36-yard scoring pass from Justin Daggett to Tony Naki. Less than two minutes later, Northwestern got a 26-yard field goal from Steve Gibbs, who also missed from 22 and 35 yards.

Geneva’s 13-hour bus ride to the Metrodome was rewarded with the victory, DeMarco said.

“It was an awesome atmosphere,” he said. “For our kids to play the way they did, they should be very proud. It will make the ride home so much more enjoyable.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.