ShareThis Page
Georgia closer to making voters show photo IDs |

Georgia closer to making voters show photo IDs

The Associated Press

ATLANTA — After several hours of at-times racially charged debate, Georgia’s Senate approved a bill Tuesday requiring voters to provide photo identification.

The bill, expected to become law, would require voters to have a driver’s license, military ID or state-issued identification card with a photo. The measure removes several forms of ID currently accepted, including Social Security cards, birth certificates and utility bills.

The legislation passed 32-22, largely along party lines, with only one Republican voting against it.

The bill must return to the House for a vote on minor Senate changes. Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue, who must sign the bill into law, has said he supports it.

Supporters said the bill is an effort to crack down on voter fraud.

Sen. Cecil Staton, a Republican, said critics are unfair to compare the bill to the poll taxes of the segregation-era South. He said efforts are about protecting the constitutional right to vote.

Critics have argued that the bill would disenfranchise the poor, the elderly and minorities, who are less likely to have driver’s licenses. They also claim the effort, by majority Republicans, would make voting more difficult for blocs that don’t tend to support the GOP.

“This is not about voter identification but, rather, a voter-constriction bill,” said Sen. Ed Harbison, a Democrat. “This ultimately will have a chilling effect.”

The bill must be approved by the U.S. Justice Department before it can take effect. Georgia — like other states with a segregationist past — must obtain federal approval for any change in voting laws.

The Justice Department approved the same bill last year. A federal judge, however, blocked that measure, saying it amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax. Most voters who didn’t already have approved identification would have had to pay $35 for a state ID card.

This year’s bill, however, would waive the $35 fee and would give counties equipment to issue ID cards.

The debate yesterday, which took up virtually all of a seven-hour Senate session, failed to reach the highly emotional level of last year’s debate. One senator brandished shackles, saying the effort reminded him of slavery, and black Democrats led a walkout after the vote.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, voters in 21 other states are asked to show identification before voting. In six states — Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, South Carolina and South Dakota — voters must show photo IDs; the 15 other states accept other forms of identification.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.