ShareThis Page
Getsy uncertain about future |

Getsy uncertain about future

Joe Bendel
| Saturday, August 28, 2004 12:00 a.m

Luke Getsy is uncertain about his future at Pitt after losing the starting quarterback job to fellow redshirt sophomore Tyler Palko.

Getsy said Friday that he loves everything about Pitt, but also pointed out that he has “options.” He also realizes that he faces the possibility of playing out his career as a back-up.

“I’m just going to think about it,” said Getsy, a Steel Valley High grad who played in six games last season while Palko took a redshirt. “I’ll weigh it out and see what goes on. As long as I’m here, I’m going to bust my (behind) for this team because you never know what will happen.”

If Getsy opts to transfer to another Division I-A school, he must do so by the 12th day of that institution’s semester to gain admission. He would then be eligible to play in 2005.

If he waits longer than the 12 days, he won’t gain admission until the winter semester, forcing him to sit out the 2004 and 2005 seasons.

Players who transfer from one NCAA Division I-A institution to another must sit out two full semesters, which is why it is so important to enroll before the 12-day mark of the fall term. Three years ago, tailback Brandon Miree played three games for Alabama before transferring to Pitt on the 12th day of the semester, thereby saving his eligibility for the following season.

Akron, which is coached by former Pitt offensive coordinator J.D. Brookhart, could be an option for Getsy. The first day of classes at Akron is Monday. That would allow Getsy to play two games for Pitt — South Florida and Ohio — before making a decision.

“I’m not sure about all that; I don’t know the rules,” Getsy said. “I don’t know how quickly I have to act.”

Palko came to Pitt with all the accolades after a stellar career at West Allegheny, while Getsy came in under the radar. But when their competition heated up, Getsy proved worthy of consideration for the starting job.

Harris said breaking the news to Getsy was the most difficult thing he’s done. He also said he hopes Getsy “hangs in there with it,” leading one to believe that even Harris is concerned about a potential transfer.

“It’s been difficult, no doubt,” Getsy said. “I wanted to get my chance on the field and the time’s not right. I’m not going to live in regret and think that I didn’t bust my (behind) for this team because I did. But things happen for a reason, and I just gotta find that reason.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.