ShareThis Page
Gilbert, PSO showcase Mahler symphony |

Gilbert, PSO showcase Mahler symphony

Mark Kanny
| Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:00 a.m

The path to transcendence in Gustav Mahler’s Third Symphony makes it a perfect choice for this weekend’s Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra “Music for the Spirit” concert led by Sir Gilbert Levine.

The concert series was begun after Levine took the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra to Rome for Pope John Paul II’s “Concert of Reconciliation” on Jan. 17, 2004, that featured Mahler’s Second Symphony (“Resurrection”). The historic concert was the first by an American orchestra at the Vatican, and the first at which a pope had asked for an encore.

The composer knew he was building on his “Resurrection” Symphony when he wrote his next one, and that he had written music of even greater scope.

“Mahler’s Third Symphony is very, very close to my heart,” Levine says. “I became a conductor because of Leonard Bernstein and his Young People’s Concerts. Bernstein was America’s window into Mahler.”

Mahler had important advocates before Bernstein, including his disciple Bruno Walter and Pittsburgh Symphony music director William Steinberg. But Bernstein’s 1961 recording of Mahler’s Third was groundbreaking, proving it to be a neglected masterpiece and leading to all of the composer’s symphonies joining the standard repertoire.

Saturday’s performance of the piece will be the sixth since the Pittsburgh Orchestra was formed in 1896 — the same year Mahler wrote it. Steinberg led the local premiere in 1972.

Levine said the Mahler Second Symphony in Rome showed what a great Mahler orchestra the Pittsburgh Symphony is, mentioning the articulations and other nuances of the strings and also the brass and winds, as well as its tradition of great music directors.

The composer was 36 years old when he wrote his Third Symphony during a summer vacation. His day job was conductor, mainly of opera, leaving only summers to put his creative ideas into finished shape. Mahler would get away from urban bustle by renting a cottage on a lake with nearby mountains for hiking. He loved nature and being able to concentrate.

“Can you imagine a brain of the creative power of Mahler’s spending a year contemplating music he would write during the summer?” Levine asks.

The music Mahler planned during the 1895-96 concert season that will be played Saturday at Heinz Hall attempts nothing less than an encompassing vision of the world. The composer had working titles for each of the six movements, with titles such as “What Nature Tells Me,” “What Flowers Tell Me,” concluding with a movement about the love of God for mankind.

Yet Mahler suppressed his program, as he did for all his symphonies, because “they are only one window on the music and he didn’t want to limit the audience,” Levine says. Or as another composer, Felix Mendelssohn, once commented, “If words could express what I had to say I wouldn’t have needed to write the music.”

Although solo and choral singing carry the fourth and fifth movements, Levine emphasizes that Mahler’s finale “almost goes back on (Ludwig van) Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony — which bursts into song. Mahler concludes by showing a vision of the soul — purely instrumentally.”

Additional Information:

‘Music for the Spirit

Featuring: Monica Groop, mezzo-soprano; Children’s Festival Chorus; Mendelssohn Choir; Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, Sir Gilbert Levine, conductor

When: 8 p.m. Saturday

Admission: $15-$40

Where: Heinz Hall, Downtown

Details: 412-392-4900 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.