ShareThis Page
Gill likely to miss Canes game |

Gill likely to miss Canes game

| Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:00 a.m

Penguins defenseman Hal Gill did not practice Wednesday and will most likely sit out tonight against the Carolina Hurricanes because of an undisclosed injury. “We’re not quite sure if he’s not going to be there,” Penguins coach Michel Therrien said. “It looks like that, but we’ll see more (today).” Therrien said defenseman Darryl Sydor will fill in for Gill if he is not available.

• Penguins left wing Matt Cooke returned to practice yesterday for the first time in a week. Bruised ribs forced him to miss three consecutive games. He hasn’t practiced or played since Oct. 14 against Philadelphia.

• Penguins center Sidney Crosby has been battling a sinus infection since Saturday. The sickness doesn’t seem to have gotten to him; he scored five points in the last two games. “It is what it is, I guess,” Crosby said. “I hope it goes away soon.”

• Penguins center Jordan Staal will go up against his brother, Eric, when the Penguins host the Hurricanes tonight. But Jordan hasn’t given his teammates any tips on how to defend his older brother. In 15 career games against the Penguins, Eric has recorded eight goals and 10 assists. “I’m sure they know each other pretty well, but most teams are pretty much focused on their team, not individual guys,” Crosby said.


7 Power-play points Penguins center Evgeni Malkin has recorded this season, which ranks No. 1 in the NHL.

9 Assists Malkin has this season, third in the league.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.