ShareThis Page
Give Ireland back to the Irish |

Give Ireland back to the Irish

The Irish Parliament is scheduled to decide on Tuesday whether to accept the Euro Zone (EZ) and European Central Bank (ECB) bailout package of about $100 billion. It will be a crucial vote deciding the future Irish sovereignty. The Irish Parliament will be standing at the Rubicon.

In 49 B.C., Julius Caesar stood with the provincial XIII legion on the northern bank of the river Rubicon. The river divided the province of Gaul from Italy proper, which prohibited, on pain of death, any provincial general entering with troops under command.

Facing death or glory, Caesar decided that it was a point of no return. Allegedly uttering the legendary phrase ” alea iacta est ” (the die is cast), he crossed the river with his men. The audacity of this dramatic move caused his political enemies, including Pompey, to flee Rome, contributing to Caesar’s eventual victory in the civil war.

Why is Ireland facing a similarly crucial decision?

The central concept of the EU was hatched covertly in the late 1940s mainly by French and German leaders. The aim was to create a single super state to compete on equal terms with the United States and the former Soviet Union. Apparently, key founding fathers, such as Jean Claude Monet, felt that the forces of nationalism were too powerful to be faced head-on. They urged small incremental steps camouflaged by deception and subterfuge.

The innocuous-sounding European Coal and Steel Community evolved into the European Economic Community, into the European Common Market, then the European Economic Union and finally into today’s European Union. Each subtle step was accompanied by a panoply of official lies, duplicity and deception.

Democracy was trampled underfoot mercilessly whenever it threatened progress. Today, even members of the European Parliament are censured officially for expressing “embarrassing” disagreement with the “European Dream.” The introduction of a single currency, the euro, was conceived as crucial to forcing economic and thereby political European union by stealth. Some observers foresee that, as the far most powerful nation, Germany effectively will run the European Union, fulfilling its century-long dreams of empire.

Unwittingly, Ireland became a pawn in this ruthless superpower game.

Possessing much infertile land, Ireland was downgraded to relative poverty by the agricultural revolution. But her people fought successfully for independence. Initially, the EU regarded Ireland as a less-developed area. Massive EU grants allowed rapid development. Wisely, Ireland held down its tax rates, encouraging high inward private investment. However, as the EU expanded into the former Soviet Union, other more undeveloped countries benefitted from EU largess, funded largely by Germany and Great Britain. Less money flowed to Ireland.

Initially, the Irish people voted down membership of the euro. But their vote was reversed under EU pressure. The same undemocratic reversal happened when Ireland voted against the new superpower Lisbon Treaty. As in England, the Irish Parliament encouraged the surrender of national freedoms for no apparent benefit.

To its great credit, Ireland ran a fiscal surplus and incurred little debt. However, when the German-dominated ECB ran a low-cost, easy-money policy to rescue the German economy from slump, it sparked massive speculation in Ireland. The Irish banks played leading roles. With the current downturn, the Irish banks became insolvent, threatening to bankrupt their country.

The EZ/ECB rescue package has been ordered, not to help the Irish people, but to rescue international banks. The draconian price is effective EU control over Ireland’s economy — threatening Ireland with severe austerity and increases in its inconveniently competitive tax rates. Arrogant EU officials announced these conditions even before the Irish PM could inform his people.

If Irish parliamentarians reject the EZ/ECB offer, they will regain some hard-won freedoms by being forced out of the Euro Zone. That, in turn, might threaten the euro. The stakes are awesome. Ireland is at the Rubicon.

On Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese attacked the United States. FDR labeled it “a date which will live in infamy.” In two days, Ireland faces a stealth attack on its national sovereignty. If Ireland’s politicians yield to the tyrannical terms of the EZ/ECB financing, Dec. 7, 2010, risks also being remembered in Ireland as a date of infamy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.