ShareThis Page
GM to pitch Volt, itself as viable |

GM to pitch Volt, itself as viable

Detroit Free Press
| Tuesday, November 2, 2010 12:00 a.m

DETROIT — Starting this week, General Motors embarks on a monthlong effort not only to reintroduce itself to the public — but to sell itself.

To pitch its initial public offering, tentatively slated for Nov. 18, GM will position itself as a new company with a leaner balance sheet and high-tech, fuel-efficient products such as the Chevy Volt extended-range electric car.

But will investors and consumers buy it?

To succeed, GM’s stock must attract big investors and maintain value and momentum when it becomes available to the general public. That’s the only way the Treasury will be able to recoup the $50 billion taxpayers gave GM.

But GM is pitching itself to a public with a fresh memory of its bankruptcy.

GM has pointed to the Volt as the main example of its promising technologies. But the Volt introduction early this month must be glitch-free to convince Americans GM really has changed.

Both the Volt introduction and the IPO occur 16 months after GM’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy — in both cases, more quickly than many thought possible. But those 16 months have been tumultuous, with several executive shake-ups and three CEOs. And the work continues.

“I think it’s premature to say we’ve completed the turnaround,” GM CEO Dan Akerson said last week. “We can’t live in the moment. We have to look forward.”

Starting late this week, two teams of executives will meet with investors in major cities in North America and Europe. They’ll sell the stock. They’ll sell the Volt. And they’ll sell themselves.

The next month holds the possibility of both elation and reality checks for General Motors executives.

Count on celebration as GM returns to the stock market that dumped the company when it went bankrupt last year. But before that, executives must sell GM to initial investors in a “road show.” That means meeting after sobering meeting, in which executives must own up to the company’s remaining shortcomings and promise to fix them.

While Akerson would not discuss details of the initial public offering, he said his team is looking beyond the short term.

“We have a lot of work in the near to intermediate term, across a wide variety of efforts. But I can assure you that we’re thinking well into 2011, ’12 and ’13,” he said. “We’re formulating strategies that will lead, I hope, to the long-term success of General Motors — not next quarter or the quarter after.”

GM must sell those strategies to investors. Three people familiar with GM’s IPO said main investor concerns include GM’s money-losing European sales region, its product plans, its unproven management team and its pension-funding obligations, which amounted to $26.4 billion on June 30.

The IPO, tentatively timed to hit the markets Nov. 18, probably will be in the $8 billion to $12 billion range, people familiar with the planning said, with the final price announced immediately before that date.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.