ShareThis Page
Good music takes center stage in Saturday night concert |

Good music takes center stage in Saturday night concert

Mark Kanny
| Monday, July 5, 2004 12:00 a.m

Nothing serves the cause of new music better than able performances of winning compositions. After two concerts at which theatricality was a dominant element in Pittsburgh New Music Ensemble’s focus, the rewards of the music itself made Saturday night’s concert truly memorable.

The elements in play varied from composer to composer, but all used their materials well. Theatricality wasn’t gone, either. While clarinetist Kevin Schempf played Michael Lowenstern’s “Blackbird” to start the second half, musicians walked onstage to place birds mounted on platforms at various places. Conductor Kevin Noe even brought out a live bird in a cage, before conducting Thomas Albert’s “13 Ways of Looking at a Blackbird.”

Such gestures were needed for no more than garnish, because the music compelled and rewarded attention. Joseph Schwantner’s “Music of Amber” was the first major composition, a modern classic now more than 20 years old. Associate conductor Brett Mitchell led a superb performance that achieved the composer’s creative intentions in part through careful attention to dynamics, both in bold strokes and nuances of blending.

The two movements of Schwantner’s chamber piece explore feeling in the context of a forest — a gentle breeze, mist and dew on leaves, birds singing, and the feeling of sanctuary, with shadows and “the trembling fragrance of the music of amber.” The composer creates his shades of color by combinations of flute, clarinet, violin, cello, piano and percussion, while the strong feeling of tonal centers lets even casual listeners sense movement and arrival apart from rhythmic energy.

Pierre Jalbert might not be as well known as Schwantner, but his Piano Trio was a big hit, too. Each of his pieces the PNME has performed in recent seasons has been both stimulating and satisfying. And so it was with the Trio. It is in two movements: “Life Cycle” and “Agnus Dei.” “Life cycle” welds the irregularly accented rhythmic energy one encounters in music by Igor Stravinsky and Bela Bartok with Jalbert’s own strongly dramatic sense of musical adventure.

Jalbert’s second movement is dedicated to Mother Teresa. Before the “Agnus Dei” began, the audience heard a recording of Mother Teresa speaking about the importance of love in the world and starting at home. Then the musicians began playing while the recording continued and then faded after a violin melody over sustained cello accompaniment. The evening’s most musically touching moment occurred in this movement, when violinist Ines Voglar played a soft and very high melody with ineffable poignancy, a magical moment that required impressive technical finesse.

Albert’s piece is made up of 13 miniatures, each drawing a few lines of Wallace Steven’s poem “13 Ways of Looking at a Blackbird.” The composer’s imaginative, purely instrumental setting finds the humor and feeling in the words that inspired each section, while his range of sonority was delightfully fresh.

The shorter pieces were excellent, too, including Lowenstern’s “A Simple Memoriam for my Father” — complete screen projections of nostalgic pictures of going to baseball games — played by Schempf in memory his own father.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.