ShareThis Page
GOP backs Murtha in redistricting plan |

GOP backs Murtha in redistricting plan

| Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG – Republican officials from Cambria and Armstrong counties made strong arguments on Tuesday for retaining U.S. Rep. John Murtha, a Johnstown Democrat, when congressional district lines are redrawn next month to comply with U.S. Census results.

Johnstown Mayor Don Zucco and Armstrong County Commissioner James Scahill said the incumbent simply puts his constituents before party when it comes to representing southwestern Pennsylvania.

“Cooperation has been the key,” Zucco said, noting that Murtha works with local officials of both parties to promote economic development.

The Johnstown mayor claimed that Murtha, ranking minority member on the powerful U.S. House Armed Services Committee, has secured about $500 million in defense contracts for his district.

“We cannot afford to lose him,” Zucco said in making his pitch before a joint meeting of the state Senate and House committees on State Government.

The panel opened hearings yesterday as the first step in the complex process of redrawing the state’s congressional districts.

Charles Lemmond, a Luzerne County Republican and chairman of the Senate State Government Committee, noted that U.S. Census results indicated that Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation will drop from 21 to 19 members for the session that opens in January 2003. The state’s population grew by only 500,000 to 12.3 million during the 1990s.

Unlike legislative redistricting, which is done by a bipartisan commission, congressional redistricting involves the full General Assembly. As a result, the majority party generally gets it way. And Republicans have control of both legislative chambers.

“We hope that Jack Murtha is not one of the two congressmen cut in the process,” Scahill said just prior to presenting his testimony. He also praised Murtha’s cooperation and ability to deliver federal money to his district.

State Sen. Robert Thompson, a Chester County Republican, called Murtha “a Pennsylvania treasure.” That was an indication that Republicans would not move to jeopardize the powerful Democratic congressman.

Stephen MacNett, chief counsel to the Senate Republicans, affirmed that position. “Certain Democrats have served the commonwealth very well,” he said.

Murtha represents the 12th Congressional District, which includes large portions of eastern Westmoreland County.

While MacNett would not comment on how any congressional districts would be redrawn, there was unofficial speculation that any revised 12th District would be pushed further into Westmoreland County.

“I have no problem with that,” said Rep. Jess Stairs, an Acme Republican. “He (Murtha) cooperates and gets things done.”

“Let it happen,” said Rep. James Casorio, an Irwin Democrat. He expressed hope that such a move would help in his efforts to revitalize Jeannette. “If what Congressman Murtha did for Johnstown is an example of his cooperation in economic revitalization, then bring his district further into Westmoreland County,” he said.

Murtha’s spokesman, Brad Clemenson, said his boss always considers what is good for his district and the state, and not party position. He said the pitch to keep his boss in Congress and the support of state legislative Republicans was gratifying.

The two committees are expected to hold additional hearings on redistricting next week, one in Allentown and another in Pittsburgh. A congressional redistricting plan is expected to clear the General Assembly before the legislative holiday recess, MacNett said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.