GOP tax cut plan to cost $28B more than Dems’ pitch |

GOP tax cut plan to cost $28B more than Dems’ pitch

A Republican proposal to preserve tax cuts for the nation’s wealthiest taxpayers would cost $28 billion more next year than would a Democratic proposal to extend the cuts solely for middle-class taxpayers, congressional tax analysts said on Thursday.

A new report from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation shows that a measure introduced by Senate Republicans to extend the George W. Bush-era tax cuts for all Americans for one year would cost about $300 billion.

A competing Democratic measure, which would extend the tax cuts only on income under $250,000, would cost about $272 billion.

Democrats have threatened to let all of the Bush tax cuts expire on schedule in December unless Republicans abandon their push to preserve the cuts for taxpayers in the top brackets.

With the release of the new cost estimates, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, questioned the wisdom of that position.

“The American people deserve better than to have the President and his allies threaten to melt down our economy for what amounts to less than three days of federal spending,” said Hatch, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. “With 41 consecutive months of unemployment over 8 percent, it just makes sense to extend this tax policy for a year so we can enact meaningful, pro-growth tax reform.”

Democrats countered that their measure was made more expensive by the addition of a variety of new middle-class tax cuts, including a credit for college tuition and an expanded credit for the working poor.

Besides, they said, the one-year savings from ending the tax cuts for the rich may not be much, but it would accumulate over time, bringing an estimated $800 billion into the U.S. Treasury by the end of the decade.

“Over 10 years, which is how we hope to do a major budget bill, it would save a lot more money,” said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.