ShareThis Page
GOP to counter Obama on immigration |

GOP to counter Obama on immigration

The Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Shortly before President Obama left for Asia last weekend, aides gave him an ambitious list of potential actions he can order to change enforcement of immigration laws without congressional approval.

Senior aides will give Obama their final recommendations as early as Tuesday. He could make his decision — and initiate the orders — soon after, although no date has been set.

He may decide to ease the threat of deportation for as many as 5 million foreigners who are in the country illegally.

Whatever he decides is likely to enrage Republicans, who warned after they swept last week’s midterm election that any executive action on immigration would spoil chances for cooperation with the new GOP-led Congress.

The package of reforms under consideration is likely to touch many parts of the immigration system.

They include an increase in visas for technology workers and their families, new instructions on who should be detained for violating immigration laws, and pay raises for immigration officers, according to two senior administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity about the internal deliberations.

The biggest impact would be from a program that could allow some of the estimated 11 million people in the country illegally to come forward, pay a fee and submit to a background check in exchange for a potential work permit and a temporary reprieve from deportation, the officials said.

That initiative would be similar to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that Obama created in 2012.

Under that program, officials have issued work permits to more than 680,000 people who were brought to the country illegally as children. Those approved are protected from deportation for two years, and can apply for extensions.

Obama is still deciding how far to expand the deferred action program.

Some aides are pushing him to include parents of children who are U.S. citizens, as well as parents of DACA recipients who have been in the country for several years. If Obama agrees, as many as 5 million people could be eligible to apply under those two categories.

But that number could shrink if other requirements, such as proof of a 10-year presence in the United States, are added.

About 400,000 people have been expelled each year since Obama took office in 2009. The record figures follow hiring initiated under President George W. Bush that has nearly doubled the size of the Border Patrol since 2004.

Republican lawmakers have said they would cut funding if Obama goes around Congress.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., threatened this week to defund any executive action on immigration. Sessions, who has been a consistent critic of Obama’s immigration policy, is on tap to head the Senate Budget Committee when Republicans take control in January.

House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters Thursday he would oppose executive action on immigration.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.