ShareThis Page
Gorman: A final game for the ‘House |

Gorman: A final game for the ‘House

Westinghouse practiced under the lights at Willie Stargell Field in Homewood, preparing for its first football game in 28 days.

Yes, you read that right.

The Bulldogs (1-6), who play at Chestnut Ridge (8-2) on Friday in a PIAA Class AA sub-regional, saw their regular season end Oct. 10 with a midfield melee with Perry.

The City League canceled the finales for both, and the ‘House suspended three starters for the remainder of the season.

“It was a mess,” Westinghouse coach Monte Robinson said. “It was definitely not a proud moment for us. It was an embarrassing moment for our team and our staff. Those things happen, but by no means do we condone that type of behavior.”

Nor should anyone, especially given that Perry punished its team by withdrawing from the City League playoffs.

But The ‘House plays by different rules, so to speak.

It is by far the smallest school in the City, with 184 boys in grades 9-11, and must play against Class AAA and Quad-A opponents.

That’s why Westinghouse wants to join the WPIAL, which needs one more football team to even out its membership.

“It’s a game changer for us,” said Robinson, a 1995 alum. “We need for something like that to happen. To play against teams our size, to play in the WPIAL and have a chance to play at Heinz Field would be great for a program with our history.”

That’s the catch.

The Bulldogs have a storied tradition, with 35 City League titles but also bring baggage like the Perry brawl for a reputation as undisciplined.

The good sign is that 24 players continued to practice for a month for the final game, which is a chance for Westinghouse to show that it has learned a lesson.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.