Archive

ShareThis Page
Gorman: A new story for O’Briens | TribLIVE.com
News

Gorman: A new story for O’Briens

Tribune-Review
| Monday, November 10, 2014 9:45 p.m

Mallory O’Brien has heard all about her aunt playing for WPIAL and PIAA volleyball titles at Baldwin and her uncle coaching its 1988 hockey state champions.

So it meant the world to the junior setter to see Julie (O’Brien) Happe and John O’Brien in the bleachers when Baldwin won its 10th WPIAL Class AAA championship — the first since 1993.

Baldwin faces two-time defending state champion Landisville Hempfield on Tuesday in the PIAA semifinals at Altoona.

“It just gives you that extra confidence in yourself that your family knows you can do it and that it’s right there,” Mallory said. “I always wanted to experience the same stories they’ve told me throughout my childhood. When it finally came, it was awesome.”

It was a trip down memory lane for Julie, who played on Baldwin’s 1980 and ’81 WPIAL and PIAA runners-up. At the WPIAL title game, she sat next to former teammates Mary Jane McCall and Debbie McSwiggin and their coach, Paul Hindes.

“It is kind of like me reliving my old experiences and memories,” said Julie, whose daughters are athletes but don’t play volleyball, “and it’s great for me to have Mallory to get my volleyball itch scratched.”

Even though Mallory doesn’t play for a club team in the offseason, the offense runs through her sets.

“She gets the least amount of credit and probably deserves the most,” said Baldwin coach Chris Kelly, who added that she is one of the best passers and defensive players on the team. “We have great outside hitters, but none of it works without Mallory.”

Mallory O’Brien has a story to tell, one that’s as good as gold.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.