ShareThis Page
Gorman: Central Catholic faces ‘phenomenon’ |

Gorman: Central Catholic faces ‘phenomenon’

Central Catholic has won with dominant defenses under Terry Totten, so the Vikings coach’s exasperation over Pine-Richland’s offense is telling.

“The more I watch them, the more I believe this is something I haven’t seen as long as I’ve been around,” Totten said. “It’s a phenomenon I haven’t seen in my 16 years in high school football.”

Of course, it’s Totten’s job to come up with a way for Central (12-1) to prevent Pine-Richland (13-0) from winning the WPIAL Class AAAA championship.

Central linebacker Bryan Glover called the Vikings’ 48-28 loss to Pine-Richland in Week 8 “an anomaly” last week, but that’s shortchanging the Rams.

“The anomaly would be, have they been held under 30 points?” Totten said. “Basically, they scored their average against us.”

The Rams, averaging 47.9 points, have scored 30 or more against everyone but North Allegheny (28 in a Week 2 overtime win), 40-plus nine times and 60-plus three times this season.

Totten called stopping Pine-Richland’s Ben DiNucci, who has completed 73.8 percent of his passes for 3,296 yards with 34 touchdowns and three interceptions, a “gigantic challenge.”

“The accuracy is uncanny,” Totten said. “You could go out there on air against nobody and throw 100 passes and you might not complete 75 of them.”

Central can’t concentrate on DiNucci because of 1,000-yard rusher Connor Slomka.

So expect a shootout.

It’s an anomaly, but Central has scored 30-plus nine times, 40-plus eight times and 50-plus four times, including a 52-34 semifinal victory over Penn-Trafford.

Pine-Richland has gotten Totten’s attention, so anything is possible. Watching the “phenomenon” should be phenomenal.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.