ShareThis Page
Gorman: Conflict for WPIAL hall |

Gorman: Conflict for WPIAL hall

Western Pennsylvania built its reputation as the cradle of quarterbacks upon Johnny Unitas, Joe Namath, Joe Montana and Dan Marino.

All four are members of the Pro Football Hall of Fame yet none of them belongs to the WPIAL Hall of Fame, if you can believe that.

Unitas played in the Catholic League at St. Justin, so his exclusion is because he’s not eligible.

If having a WPIAL hall without Beaver Falls’ Namath, Ringgold’s Montana and Central Catholic’s Marino undermines the league’s credibility, there’s an explanation for their absence.

“They won’t come,” WPIAL executive director Tim O’Malley said. “We’d love to have them back. They have not expressed interest in being part of it. We’ve reached out countless times.”

The introduction of the WPIAL Hall of Fame coincided with the celebration of its 100th anniversary. The banquet is a profitable annual enterprise.

Look, the WPIAL blew it by not celebrating those first 100 years by honoring its top 100 athletes. It would have prevented WPIAL alums who became pro superstars — add Aliquippa’s Mike Ditka and Hopewell’s Tony Dorsett to the list — from feeling insulted by not being first-ballot picks by the WPIAL.

Instead, the league inducts athletes, coaches, contributors and teams who appreciate the honor by attending its banquet.

“On an annual basis, the class that goes in is exemplary,” O’Malley said. “There are accomplishments continuously that will be honored down the road.”

Don’t expect Namath, Montana or Marino to be among them. Just because they are from the cradle of quarterbacks, the WPIAL shouldn’t have to beg them to come back to their crib.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.