ShareThis Page
Gorman: Neshannock wants WIN |

Gorman: Neshannock wants WIN

Fred Mozzocio brought a motto to Neshannock in the form of an acronym that was foreign to its football program.

WIN: What’s Important Now.

That’s why Mozzocio sees no need to mention that Clairton has won more WPIAL championships (10) than Neshannock has playoff appearances (seven) before their Class A semifinal.

“Our kids know who Clairton is: Clairton is the next opponent we have. That’s what we’re looking at them as,” Mozzocio said. “We don’t care how many WPIAL titles they have, just like they don’t care that we’ve never won.

“That’s all that needs to be said. We don’t care about anything else Friday night. Anything else is irrelevant.”

Clairton (11-0) has been the most dominant team in the WPIAL, which makes Neshannock (11-0) the biggest underdog in these semifinals. The Lancers, once the laughingstock of Lawrence County, also might have the best chance to pull an upset.

Two years ago, eight players from Neshannock’s senior class played Clairton tough in a 37-7 semifinal loss. Those seniors are 30-5 in three seasons, the best run in history at a school that lost 28 consecutive from 2000-02.

“That’s something we remind them about: Today, when people in Lawrence County say ‘Neshannock football,’ there’s still a little chuckle behind it,” Mozzocio said. “Even going undefeated this year, you hear people second-guessing this team and saying, ‘They’re not that good.’ We always have a little chip on our shoulders.”

After being eliminated by the eventual PIAA champion in the past two semifinals, the Lancers are hoping that chip carries them to their first WPIAL final.

They just have to remember WIN. And then, you know, win.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.