Gorman: Palko perfect for West Allegheny |

Gorman: Palko perfect for West Allegheny

Kevin Gorman

Bob Palko was warned when he took the job 19 years ago that he would never win at his alma mater, West Allegheny.

Seven WPIAL Class AAA championships later, Palko has not only proven people wrong but made history in the process.

West Allegheny hasn’t just won WPIAL titles, it’s done so by an average margin of 18.1 points.

“That’s the thing: They get there and they win,” said Hopewell coach Dave Vestal, whose Vikings lost to West Allegheny in the 2001 and ’09 finals. “How many times have they got there and lost?”

Actually, West Allegheny is 7-0 under Palko in WPIAL finals.


A victory over Central Valley Friday would make Palko the first coach in league history to win eight WPIAL titles.

What’s his secret to success?

“I don’t know,” Palko said. “Lucky, I guess.”

More like perfectly prepared.

Both Vestal and West Mifflin coach Ray Braszo, whose Titans lost to West Allegheny in the 2000 and ’12 finals, noted how sound the Indians play in every phase.

Palko coaches his team to prepare for and play like there’s no tomorrow. It’s why West Allegheny often overwhelms opponents.

“It only takes a play to change a game, a moment to make a difference,” Palko said. “They’re so worried about letting the guy next to them down that it becomes a powerful tool.”

West Allegheny plays with a confidence that comes from its coach, who turned a deaf ear to the naysayers and turned his program into a perennial power.

“He does an unbelievable job,” Vestal said. “He’s an outstanding coach, has the kids believing.”

Regardless of whether it wins an eighth WPIAL title, Palko has proven perfect for West A.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.