Gorman: Veterans Day a special day in Slomka’s home |

Gorman: Veterans Day a special day in Slomka’s home

Veterans Day is a special day in Connor Slomka’s home, one he said was “very important” even before the Pine-Richland star running back committed to play for Army.

Slomka’s father, Jim, also attended the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and later was an assistant athletic director at Army. Slomka’s attitude of gratitude isn’t limited to wanting to serve his country.

A 1,000-yard rusher as the feature back of a power offense as a sophomore and junior, he has been overshadowed by 3,000-yard passer Ben DiNucci after the Rams switched to a spread.

Still, the 6-foot, 220-pound Slomka has rushed for 1,036 yards and 27 touchdowns this fall — hurdling a Central Catholic safety in stride on one — for No. 1 Pine-Richland (11-0), which plays McKeesport (10-1) in the WPIAL Class AAAA semifinals.

DiNucci and Slomka have formed a formidable one-two punch as the rare 6,000-yard passer and 3,000-yard rusher in the same backfield.

“I’d take everything we’ve had this year over (statistics),” Slomka said. “This year has been so fun for everybody.”

Choosing to play football at West Point and the mandatory military service that follows was no small matter to Slomka.

He had committed to a lacrosse scholarship to Ohio State as a sophomore, but decided that football was his favorite. And if he was going to football, he wanted to play it at West Point.

“I definitely grew up around it but I don’t think I can ever be prepared for it until I get there,” said Slomka, who lived on campus as a child. “It’s a huge opportunity, to get an education I couldn’t get anywhere else and to serve my country.”

And a very important one.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.