ShareThis Page
Government sale of Citigroup stock put on hold |

Government sale of Citigroup stock put on hold

The Associated Press
| Friday, December 18, 2009 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — Everything was set: The government would begin selling its stake in Citigroup, and the bank would sell new stock and pay back bailout money. Both sides could untangle a relationship that neither saw as ideal.

But the Treasury Department was forced to reverse its plan to unload its Citi shares, showing that both the government and the bank badly misjudged investors’ appetite for the bank’s stock.

Citi was competing with Bank of America and Wells Fargo, both of which were selling stock to raise money and were considered in better financial health than Citigroup. Their offers were more warmly received by investors.

Plus, Citi’s offer occurred on the same day that a major investor, the main sovereign wealth fund of Abu Dhabi, filed a multibillion-dollar lawsuit accusing the bank of misrepresenting its financial health in 2007.

Banking industry analysts said Thursday the government should have seen the cool reception coming.

“Either these guys didn’t have any advice, or they didn’t take the advice, or the whole thing was done in such haste that they didn’t even consider it,” said Christopher Whalen, managing director of the financial research firm Institutional Risk Analytics.

The government has been eager to unload its stake — and under pressure from the bank to do it, too — in order to show the United States has confidence in Citi, which holds the largest remaining chunk of bailout money.

Disentangling itself from Citigroup would help the Obama administration fight the perception that it’s been coddling Wall Street banks.

“All else being equal, we’d rather not own a chunk of Citi,” said Douglas Elliott, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former investment banker. “It’s not what we want our government doing.”

Treasury declined to discuss the details of its decision.

Citigroup had announced plans to sell 5.4 billion shares of stock at $3.15 a share to help repay $20 billion in government bailout money. That price was 9 percent below where shares were trading before the announcement.

Yesterday, Citi stock fell another 7 percent, closing at $3.20. Investors doubted that the market could have absorbed the additional $5 billion in stock Treasury wanted to unload.

“The market is not buying the Citi story right now,” said Alois Pirker, a research director at financial consultancy Aite Group.

While some analysts conceded there was no way the government could have anticipated the big lawsuit, they said the Treasury never should have considered selling its stake while the bank was making such a big offer as well.

“Why did both Treasury as well as Citi’s capital markets people misread the market?” asked independent banking consultant Bert Ely. “There’s a bit of egg on everyone’s faces.”

Analysts said Citi didn’t have much of a choice but to sell at such a low price. Investors are still uncertain about Citi’s health.

After accounts for preferred stock dividends and the debt exchange that gave the government a stake in the bank, Citi lost $3.24 billion in the third quarter. Its loan losses are still piling up, and it still has to find buyers for some of the risky investments that got it into this mess.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.