Grading eateries |

Grading eateries

In response to the news story ” Controversial Allegheny health grading policy could return ” (Nov. 8 and I would like to applaud its author, Adam Brandolph, for giving due attention to restaurant owners.

They play a crucial role in the area’s public health and economy. Owners such as Brian Carey of Cappy’s Cafe and Jeff Cohen of Smallman Street Deli raise excellent points about how to fairly assess establishments.

As a health-conscious consumer who enjoys dining at a number of Pittsburgh’s neighborhood-gem restaurants, I think many of the owners quoted in this story and Dr. Bruce Dixon, director of the Allegheny County Health Department, have it right. Restaurants do need to “watch their Ps and Qs,” but a system that is fair will provide the most accurate information to consumers and will encourage good behavior.

The new system needs to include incentives for restaurant owners to do well consistently and should allow establishments to fix their mistakes by conducting repeat evaluations for first-time offenders midway through the year.

Results of the inspection should fully disclose how the establishment is rated by listing a letter grade, a numerical score and scores by category.

Melissa N. Fann


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.