Grant to help stop S. Buffalo road erosion |

Grant to help stop S. Buffalo road erosion

SOUTH BUFFALO: The township has received a $55,000 state grant that will help its public works crew stop an erosion problem that’s eating away at South Scenic Road.

The grant will pay for large rocks and big railroad ties to be placed in Buffalo Creek near a bend in South Scenic Road where the road washed out earlier this summer, according to Supervisor Dave Brestensky.

These will be arranged in 10 “fingers” that will jut out into swiftly flowing Buffalo Creek. The fingers will act as buffers to slow down the creek.

The move also could attract more trout to this popular stream, Brestensky said.

Supervisors, who learned the township got the grant this week, haven’t yet decided whether to start the work before or after winter.

Although South Scenic Road is in no immediate danger of buckling or washing out now, the Buffalo Creek current is eating away at the bank that props up the road, said Supervisor Ron Covone.

“Hopefully this (work) will enhance the quality for sportsmen who fish Buffalo Creek, and help beautify South Scenic Drive,” Covone said.

This summer’s heavy rains contributed to three township roads washing out, which refers to a surge of water that breaks up and washes away the sides of a road.

Repairing washouts at North Scenic Drive, South Scenic Drive and White Rock Road cost the township about $50,000, Covone said.

The roads were closed for a couple days in the summer after the heavy rains.

South Buffalo Township runs on an annual budget of about $800,000.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.