ShareThis Page
Greensburg female spotlight athlete: Angela Beck |

Greensburg female spotlight athlete: Angela Beck

| Wednesday, October 27, 2010 12:00 a.m

Angela Beck

School: Ringgold

Sport: Soccer

Class: Senior

Claim to fame: Beck has been a starter for four years and a captain for two. She was named to the All-Section 5 team in 2007 and 2009, and selected as Section 5 rookie of the year in 2007 and Section 5 MVP in 2009. Against West Mifflin this season, Beck scored consecutive goals from the corner and finished with three in the game. Academically, she maintains a 4.0 grade point average. She’s also treasurer of Ringgold’s senior class.

Pregame rituals: “I say a prayer during the national anthem. I do a minute or two of footwork before each game because I think if I don’t, I will get bad luck.”

Leadership: “I enjoy being a leader. I can never stop talking on the field. It helps because I can instruct my fellow teammates. I play defense, so I can see the whole field. The other captains and I try to encourage our teammates.”

Why soccer? “My friends were playing, and I thought I was missing out on something, so I decided to try it.”

Her position: “My coach chose defense for me. I have pretty much played every position. My favorite is center midfielder because I am always in the action. Everything is around me, and I get to be a part of everything.”

The future: “I will probably play Division III or intramurals. As far as school, I have applied to Pitt, Penn State, Case Western and Dayton. So far Penn State is my No. 1 choice, and I want to major in engineering.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.