ShareThis Page
Greensburg Laurels & Lances |

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Friday, June 27, 2008 12:00 a.m

Laurel: To holding the line on taxes. A few local school districts have managed to keep taxes flat next year. Some did it by using cash reserves. Some did it the old-fashioned way, with an eye toward achieving better efficiencies. Sure, it takes more work to keep from reaching deeper into the public’s pockets. That’s why it’s called public service.

On the “Watch List”: Trafford officials. Borough council is moving ahead with a comprehensive plan, the first since 1961. About $46,000 in local grant money is expected to be matched by state funding to help cover the plan’s costs. But after all the hoopla in the development phase, these “visions of the future,” once completed, oftentimes are forgotten. And that’s an awful lot of money to pay for a document if it attracts nothing more than dust bunnies.

Laurel: To local air travelers. Officials at Arnold Palmer Regional Airport warned in March that the airport’s lone commercial carrier may curtail service unless passenger totals increased. And, sure enough, the market responded. Passengers aboard Northwest Airlines flights from the Unity airport to Detroit Metropolitan Airport were up 30 percent in May over the same month last year. And flights last month were at 70 percent capacity, up from 56 percent last year. That’s something to build on.

Laurel: To caring for our military. Johnstown will be the site of a new, five-year pilot project to care for wounded military personnel who have suffered brain trauma. The facility, expected to open this fall at the Hiram G. Andrews Center, will provide services for 25 patients. The need is overwhelming. U.S. Rep. John P. Murtha says traumatic brain injuries are “the signature wound of this war,” afflicting nearly 320,000 U.S. military personnel.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.