ShareThis Page
Greensburg Male Athlete of the Week |

Greensburg Male Athlete of the Week

| Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:00 a.m

Mike Salopek

School: Norwin

Class: Senior

Sport: Wrestling

Notable: It’s been a long time since Mike Salopek was that 60-pound first-grader getting used being a wrestler.

The longest part of that journey might have been the last six minutes of the WPIAL 189-pound championship match against Chartiers Valley’s Matt Wilps. Early in the second period, he felt a pop in his troublesome knee.

But the Norwin senior refused to give in to the pain, eventually registering a takedown in overtime to win his first WPIAL title, 3-1.

Salopek, who strained a ligament and tore his meniscus in the Westmoreland County Coaches Association tournament, said he couldn’t tell which he aggravated the most.

“Both hurt pretty bad,” said Salopek, a key member of Norwin’s talented football team. “When it happened, I could feel the pain a lot. But I just kept fighting through it, hobbling around out there. I’m sure everybody could tell I was hurt, but I wasn’t going to let that get me.”

Salopek will take his 31-0 to Hershey next weekend for the PIAA tournament, where he’ll be looking to exact a bit of revenge for a loss in the last 12 seconds of a PIAA semifinal bout with Nate Eachus of Easton.

“I think I have a really good chance to win up there,” said Salopek, who has a 109-17 career record and received a wrestling scholarship from Virginia. “I know the state champion (Eachus) is in my weight class, but I still feel I can win.”

His coach, Todd Schuchert, doesn’t doubt Salopek’s thinking a bit.

“I think that loss motivated him all year. I think it turned out to be a blessing for him,” Schuchert said. “He moves really well for a big guy, and his style is fun to watch. He’s a high-paced, high-intensity wrestler.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.