Archive

ShareThis Page
Greensburg male spotlight athlete: Garrett Damich | TribLIVE.com
News

Greensburg male spotlight athlete: Garrett Damich

Garrett Damich

School: Bentworth

Class: Junior

Sport: Golf

Claim to fame: Damich took medalist honors in the Black Hills Conference tournament with a 3-over-par 75 at Village Green Golf Club. He won the Southwestern Pennsylvania Junior Golf Tour summer- long tour — 11 courses, 12 events — with 59.5 points. He came in eighth overall and first in Division II by shooting a 76 in the WPIAL tournament at Verona. Damich qualified for the PIAA West Region tournament at Tom’s Run Golf Course near Blairsville and tied for second with a 70. He was the first Bentworth golfer to go that deep into the postseason in 20 years.

State tournament: “It felt great to qualify. Even though I didn’t play well, I am still proud of myself. As far as next year, I always try as hard as I can, so I don’t know if my practice routine will change too much. But I will prepare as well as I can so I can qualify again.”

Why golf? “It’s kind of a family thing. My dad plays, and my grandma used to play but can’t now because of health reasons. I’ve played most of my golf with my (older) brother. It’s pretty cool to play the same sport because he can give me some guidelines and tell me how to improve. Also it’s something we can relate to and become better friends.”

The future: “One of my main goals is to get a scholarship. It would be great to play competitive college golf, but I haven’t really thought about where I want to go yet. It depends on where I get a scholarship offer.”


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.