Greensburg officer: Drugs found on Fayette man |

Greensburg officer: Drugs found on Fayette man

A Greensburg police officer said Thursday that a search of a Fayette County man in October turned up heroin, cocaine, marijuana, pain medicine and $1,736.

Patrolman Shawn Denning testified during a preliminary hearing that the drugs and money were found on Andre Michael Galloway, 34, of Republic, after police responded to a domestic argument around 3:30 a.m. Oct. 2 at Galloway’s former home at 18 Westminster Ave. in Greensburg.

Greensburg District Judge James Albert held Galloway for trial on charges of manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance; possession of a controlled substance, a small amount of marijuana and drug paraphernalia; resisting arrest; public drunkenness, and disorderly conduct.

Denning said his department received a call about an argument at Galloway’s home.

“I heard a female’s voice saying, ‘Don’t hit her,’ ” Denning said. He said he also heard “smacking” sounds when he arrived.

Police knocked and pounded on the door of the residence for a while. Finally, a woman unlocked it. Denning said he saw Galloway standing at the top of a stairwell. Galloway then came out onto the porch.

Denning said Galloway continued to yell. The officer said he could smell alcohol on Galloway.

He was told to be quiet, but he continued to yell, Denning said, so he was arrested.

During a search, police found a bag of suspected crack cocaine, a bag of cocaine, 50 small bags of heroin, seven Vicodin pills, a small bag of marijuana and the cash, Denning said.

The officer said the stamp bags of heroin did not have a name printed on them and appeared to be “packaged at home and not by a machine.”

Denning said police had to twice use a stun gun on Galloway.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.