ShareThis Page
Greensburg Salem claims AAA title spot |

Greensburg Salem claims AAA title spot

| Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:00 a.m

In the rematch for a shot at a state title, Greensburg Salem prevailed.

Senior guard Chris Klimchock’s only points of the second half — four foul shots in the final 40 seconds — secured Greensburg Salem’s 46-45 victory over WPIAL champion Hampton on Tuesday night in a PIAA Class AAA semifinal boys basketball game at Gateway High School.

Klimchock’s final two points with 16.5 seconds left gave Greensburg Salem a 46-42 lead before Hampton’s Nathan Winek connected on a 3-pointer at the buzzer to make the final margin a single point.

“Another easy one,” Greensburg Salem coach Paul Sapotichne joked.

Greensburg Salem (23-5) will face Radnor Archbishop Carroll (26-3) for a PIAA championship at 8 p.m. Friday at Bryce Jordan Center in State College.

“I don’t know how I feel right now. We’re in the state championship,” Klimchock said.

Junior guard Jake Matthews led Greensburg Salem with 17 points, and Klimchock added 12. Matt Madia scored 17 for Hampton (25-5), which won the WPIAL championship last month, along the way defeating Greensburg Salem, 52-49, in overtime in the quarterfinals.

This time, Greensburg Salem came out on top, thanks in part to clutch free-throw shooting down the stretch. The Golden Lions converted 6-of-8 attempts in the final 1 minutes, 5 seconds.

“They made their shots when they had to, plus they hit their free throws down the stretch,” Hampton coach Joe Lafko said.

Matthews, whose 3-point shooting in the first half kept Greensburg Salem close, scored nine consecutive points during a 2-minute span in the fourth quarter to put the Golden Lions in the lead for good.

His 3-pointer with 3:08 remaining broke a 33-33 tie. It came after both teams went cold and failed to score for the final 1 1/2 minutes of the third quarter and the first 2.5 minutes of the fourth.

“When you start missing, you just have to get it out of your mind and know it’ll go in,” Matthews said.

The night was a defensive struggle for both teams, with neither taking a sizeable lead.

Greensburg Salem, with the diminutive Klimchock controlling the offense, challenged Hampton’s big men inside, particularly in the second half.

“We missed some opportunities inside,” Lafko said. “I think the environment … and we did some things uncharacteristic that we haven’t done all season. We didn’t take advantage of our inside game as much as we could have, especially in the first half. We’ve been able to dominate the inside area, offensive and defensively. Tonight we didn’t do a good job at that.”

After the game, Greensburg Salem cut down the nets, even though they hadn’t won a state title.

But Sapotichne enjoyed it, nonetheless.

“I’ve never been here before. Any opportunity I get to cut down the nets, I’ll do it,” he said. “Even in the driveway.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.