Grinding out a Pulitzer in W.Va. |

Grinding out a Pulitzer in W.Va.

Charleston Gazette-Mail reporter Eric Eyre won the 2017 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting. (Charleston Gazette-Mail via AP)
Tribune-Review contributing writer Andrew Conte.

Eric Eyre always thought reporters had to write something like a nine-part series to win a Pulitzer Prize. It turns out all he had to do was keep grinding.

Eyre, 51, figures he writes about 250 stories a year as a statehouse reporter for West Virginia’s Charleston Gazette-Mail newspaper, circulation 37,000. He files a story almost every day, and another for the Sunday edition. Once a month, he works the night cops beat.

A couple of stories Eyre wrote in December changed the pace of his work, for now.

With the help of pro bono lawyers, Eyre filed a Freedom of Information Act request and worked through the legal system to compel the state attorney general to release U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency data showing exactly how many opioid pills had gone to specific West Virginia pharmacies over six years.

Drug wholesalers had sent 780 million hydrocodone and oxycodone pills to the state. In just two years, nearly 9 million pills had gone to one pharmacy in Kermit, a Mingo County town with 392 residents.

The data lined up with prescription opioid overdose deaths. Over the six years, 1,728 West Virginians fatally overdosed on opioids. Mingo County’s rate for such deaths ranks fourth in the nation.

As soon as Eyre reported his findings, national news outlets and readers all over the country reached out. Hundreds of people — local residents, former West Virginians, recovering addicts everywhere — emailed questions and comments. He has tried to answer every one.

“I’ve done stories like this throughout my career and I’ve never had something happen so crazy,” Eyre told me.

Then the awards started coming. I met Eyre in Cincinnati, where he received a Scripps Howard award for Distinguished Service to the First Amendment. Two days earlier, the Pulitzer committee had recognized him for investigative reporting. Eyre hadn’t watched the Pulitzer announcement. His newsroom hadn’t prepared for a party. He found out when a former co-worker called to congratulate him. The newspaper’s owner ran out to a Rite Aid to buy bottles of Korbel champagne .

That night, Eyre’s wife, Lori Dubrawka, made spaghetti for dinner. Her family lived in Coraopolis when she was born, and she graduated from North Hills High School. He’s from Ambler, Pa., in Montgomery County. They met at Penn State.

Since the Pulitzer, it’s been hard to get any work done with all of the distractions.

Eyre won these awards for his relentless, grind-it-out efforts. But he also represents a lot of other hardworking journalists who do not always get the same attention. These people work at large national media companies, at tiny community newspapers and in statehouse bureaus and municipal buildings across the country. Eyre sees that too.

“Every year you think you may have a shot and then you see the competition and it’s overwhelming,” he told me. “There’s so much good stuff done every year.”

Days after winning the awards, Eyre said he’s still struggling to comprehend all of the attention.

“I’m still overwhelmed. I want to get back to reporting.”

Andrew Conte is the director of the Center for Media Innovation at Point Park University.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.