ShareThis Page
Group tries to name 5 to Heinz board |

Group tries to name 5 to Heinz board

For the third time in about a year, high-powered investors are demanding better stock results from a top Pittsburgh corporation.

H.J. Heinz Co. disclosed Friday that a group led by billionaire Nelson Peltz – a group which includes professional golfer Greg Norman – wants to nominate five candidates to the company’s board of directors.

Trian Partners Master Fund L.P., a Cayman Islands limited partnership led by Peltz, notified Heinz of its intentions. The partnership wants to block the Heinz board from taking action that would prevent the outsiders from being named directors, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Heinz spokeswoman Debbie Foster said Heinz practices an “open door” policy with all shareholders. She said company officials have held no discussions with Peltz.

Heinz shares jumped 88 cents, or 2.3 percent, to $38.23 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Peltz, 63, with a net worth of $1.1 billion, is CEO of Triarc Cos., parent of the Arby’s restaurant chain. Norman operates a Florida-based group of businesses.

In addition to Peltz and Norman, other board nominees are Peter May, Trian’s president; Edward Garden, a Trian portfolio manager and Peltz’s father-in-law; and Michael Weinstein, chairman of Inov8 Beverage Co. LLC.

“We have no comment on the Heinz situation,” Trian spokeswoman Ann Tarbell said.

Heinz’s share price has declined since CEO William Johnson arrived in 1998. In March that year, Heinz shares traded near $52, about 35 percent higher than the $38.23 price per share when the market closed yesterday.

In its SEC filing, Heinz pointed out that over the last three years it has refocused on its core brands. Its accomplishments include the $2 billion spin-off of pet food, tuna, private-label soup and baby food operations to Del Monte, and the return to shareholders of more than $1 billion in dividends and share buybacks, the company said.

Companies can benefit when investors take an active role, a Carnegie Mellon University professor said.

“These types of actions truly are not a bad thing,” said Jeffrey R. Williams, a professor of business strategy at the Oakland university’s Tepper School of Business. “It’s always true that these guys would not do this unless they saw an opportunity to make the company better. They have a vision for the company, to make the company’s pieces make more sense.”

Foster said Heinz has no rules in place to stop an outsider from joining the board.

That stands in contrast to the stance last year of generic drug manufacturer Mylan Laboratories Inc., which aggressively sought to head off corporate raider Carl Icahn. Mylan amended its bylaws to push back its annual meeting and move up the cutoff date for nominating directors.

Icahn wanted to stop Mylan’s efforts to buy King Pharmaceuticals Inc.

The King deal collapsed, primarily because the companies couldn’t agree on a new sale price following revelations that King had to restate 2 1/2 years of earnings. But Icahn’s presence certainly turned up the heat.

Earlier this year, Mellon Financial’s board of directors hired Robert Kelly as chairman, chief executive and president, replacing long-time executive Martin McGuinn. The impetus for change: Boston-based hedge fund Highfields Capital Management and its managing director, Richard Grubman.

Heinz isn’t the only food company in Peltz’s sights.

On Thursday, Peltz and fast-food purveyor Wendy’s International disclosed a deal in which the Dublin, Ohio-based chain will speed up the sale of its Tim Hortons coffee and doughnuts chain, consider selling its Baja Fresh Mexican Grill restaurants, and add three Peltz nominees to its board. In return, Peltz and Sandell Asset Management Corp. agreed to vote their shares in favor of Wendy’s board nominees.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.